Thanks Jesus for Thy Mercy – Mechandise of 2 Peter 3:3

Thanks Jesus for Thy Mercy – Mechandise of 2 Peter 3:3

From this verse i gather that we should take care to not approach people with flattery instead of truth, nor consider or speak of our church goers as a commodity, and outreach as marketing, and our churches like a business venture.  Each individual soul is incredibly precious, worth the blood of Christ, Jesus died for them

And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not.

God have mercy on me and us all for how we have done this, help us to do right in all in Jesus name

Hallelujah, Luther’s earlier 97 theses

Hallelujah, Luther’s earlier 97 theses

1. To say that Augustine exaggerates in speaking against heretics is to say that Augustine tells lies almost everywhere. This is contrary to common knowledge.
2. This is the same as permitting Pelagians and all heretics to triumph, indeed, the same as conceding victory to them.
3. It is the same as making sport of the authority of all doctors of theology.
4. It is therefore true that man, being a bad tree, can only will and do evil [Cf. Matt. 7:17–18].
5. It is false to state that man’s inclination is free to choose between either of two opposites. Indeed, the inclination is not free, but captive. This is said in opposition to common opinion.
6. It is false to state that the will can by nature conform to correct precept. This is said in opposition to Scotus and Gabriel.
7. As a matter of fact, without the grace of God the will produces an act that is perverse and evil.
8. It does not, however, follow that the will is by nature evil, that is, essentially evil, as the Manichaeans maintain.
9. It is nevertheless innately and inevitably evil and corrupt.
10. One must concede that the will is not free to strive toward whatever is declared good. This in opposition to Scotus and Gabriel.
11. Nor is it able to will or not to will whatever is prescribed.
12. Nor does one contradict St. Augustine when one says that nothing is so much in the power of the will as the will itself.
13. It is absurd to conclude that erring man can love the creature above all things, therefore also God. This in opposition to Scotus and Gabriel.
14. Nor is it surprising that the will can conform to erroneous and not to correct precept.
15. Indeed, it is peculiar to it that it can only conform to erroneous and not to correct precept.
16. One ought rather to conclude: since erring man is able to love the creature it is impossible for him to love God.
17. Man is by nature unable to want God to be God. Indeed, he himself wants to be God, and does not want God to be God.
18. To love God above all things by nature is a fictitious term, a chimera, as it were. This is contrary to common teaching.
19. Nor can we apply the reasoning of Scotus concerning the brave citizen who loves his country more than himself.
20. An act of friendship is done, not according to nature, but according to prevenient grace. This in opposition to Gabriel.
21. No act is done according to nature that is not an act of concupiscence against God.
22. Every act of concupiscence against God is evil and a fornication of the spirit.
23. Nor is it true that an act of concupiscence can be set aright by the virtue of hope. This in opposition to Gabriel.
24. For hope is not contrary to charity, which seeks and desires only that which is of God.
25. Hope does not grow out of merits, but out of suffering which destroys merits. This in opposition to the opinion of many.
26. An act of friendship is not the most perfect means for accomplishing that which is in one. Nor is it the most perfect means for obtaining the grace of God or turning toward and approaching God.
27. But it is an act of conversion already perfected, following grace both in time and by nature.
28. If it is said of the Scripture passages, “Return to me,…and I will return to you” [Zech. 1:3.], “Draw near to God and he will draw near to you” [Jas. 4:8], “Seek and you will find” [Matt. 7:7], “You will seek me and find me” [Jer. 29:13], and the like, that one is by nature, the other by grace, this is no different from asserting what the Pelagians have said.
29. The best and infallible preparation for grace and the sole disposition toward grace is the eternal election and predestination of God.
30. On the part of man, however, nothing precedes grace except indisposition and even rebellion against grace.
31. It is said with the idlest demonstrations that the predestined can be damned individually but not collectively. This in opposition to the scholastics.
32. Moreover, nothing is achieved by the following saying: Predestination is necessary by virtue of the consequence of God’s willing, but not of what actually followed, namely, that God had to elect a certain person.
33. And this is false, that doing all that one is able to do can remove the obstacles to grace. This in opposition to several authorities.
34. In brief, man by nature has neither correct precept nor good will.
35. It is not true that an invincible ignorance excuses one completely (all scholastics notwithstanding);
36. For ignorance of God and oneself and good work is always invincible to nature.
37. Nature, moreover, inwardly and necessarily glories and takes pride in every work which is apparently and outwardly good.
38. There is no moral virtue without either pride or sorrow, that is, without sin.
39. We are not masters of our actions, from beginning to end, but servants. This in opposition to the philosophers.
40. We do not become righteous by doing righteous deeds but, having been made righteous, we do righteous deeds. This in opposition to the philosophers.
41. Virtually the entire Ethics of Aristotle is the worst enemy of grace. This in opposition to the scholastics.
42. It is an error to maintain that Aristotle’s statement concerning happiness does not contradict Catholic doctrine. This in opposition to the doctrine on morals.
43. It is an error to say that no man can become a theologian without Aristotle. This in opposition to common opinion.
44. Indeed, no one can become a theologian unless he becomes one without Aristotle.
45. To state that a theologian who is not a logician is a monstrous heretic—this is a monstrous and heretical statement. This in opposition to common opinion.
46. In vain does one fashion a logic of faith, a substitution brought about without regard for limit and measure. This in opposition to the new dialecticians.
47. No syllogistic form is valid when applied to divine terms. This in opposition to the Cardinal.
48. Nevertheless it does not for that reason follow that the truth of the doctrine of the Trinity contradicts syllogistic forms. This in opposition to the same new dialecticians and to the Cardinal.
49. If a syllogistic form of reasoning holds in divine matters, then the doctrine of the Trinity is demonstrable and not the object of faith.
50. Briefly, the whole Aristotle is to theology as darkness is to light. This in opposition to the scholastics.
51. It is very doubtful whether the Latins comprehended the correct meaning of Aristotle.
52. It would have been better for the church if Porphyry with his universals had not been born for the use of theologians.
53. Even the more useful definitions of Aristotle seem to beg the question.
54. For an act to be meritorious, either the presence of grace is sufficient, or its presence means nothing. This in opposition to Gabriel.
55. The grace of God is never present in such a way that it is inactive, but it is a living, active, and operative spirit; nor can it happen that through the absolute power of God an act of friendship may be present without the presence of the grace of God. This in opposition to Gabriel.
56. It is not true that God can accept man without his justifying grace. This in opposition to Ockham.
57. It is dangerous to say that the law commands that an act of obeying the commandment be done in the grace of God. This in opposition to the Cardinal and Gabriel.
58. From this it would follow that “to have the grace of God” is actually a new demand going beyond the law.
59. It would also follow that fulfilling the law can take place without the grace of God.
60. Likewise it follows that the grace of God would be more hateful than the law itself.
61. It does not follow that the law should be complied with and fulfilled in the grace of God. This in opposition to Gabriel.
62. And that therefore he who is outside the grace of God sins incessantly, even when he does not kill, commit adultery, or become angry.
63. But it follows that he sins because he does not spiritually fulfill the law.
64. Spiritually that person does not kill, does not do evil, does not become enraged when he neither becomes angry nor lusts.
65. Outside the grace of God it is indeed impossible not to become angry or lust, so that not even in grace is it possible to fulfill the law perfectly.
66. It is the righteousness of the hypocrite actually and outwardly not to kill, do evil, etc.
67. It is by the grace of God that one does not lust or become enraged.
68. Therefore it is impossible to fulfill the law in any way without the grace of God.
69. As a matter of fact, it is more accurate to say that the law is destroyed by nature without the grace of God.
70. A good law will of necessity be bad for the natural will.
71. Law and will are two implacable foes without the grace of God.
72. What the law wants, the will never wants, unless it pretends to want it out of fear or love.
73. The law, as taskmaster of the will, will not be overcome except by the “child, who has been born to us” [Isa. 9:6].
74. The law makes sin abound because it irritates and repels the will [Rom. 7:13].
75. The grace of God, however, makes justice abound through Jesus Christ because it causes one to be pleased with the law.
76. Every deed of the law without the grace of God appears good outwardly, but inwardly it is sin. This in opposition to the scholastics.
77. The will is always averse to, and the hands inclined toward, the law of the Lord without the grace of God.
78. The will which is inclined toward the law without the grace of God is so inclined by reason of its own advantage.
79. Condemned are all those who do the works of the law.
80. Blessed are all those who do the works of the grace of God.
81. Chapter Falsas concerning penance, dist. 5, 10 confirms the fact that works outside the realm of grace are not good, if this is not understood falsely.
82. Not only are the religious ceremonials not the good law and the precepts in which one does not live (in opposition to many teachers);
83. But even the Decalogue itself and all that can be taught and prescribed inwardly and outwardly is not good law either.
84. The good law and that in which one lives is the love of God, spread abroad in our hearts by the Holy Spirit.
85. Anyone’s will would prefer, if it were possible, that there would be no law and to be entirely free.
86. Anyone’s will hates it that the law should be imposed upon it; if, however, the will desires imposition of the law it does so out of love of self.
87. Since the law is good, the will, which is hostile to it, cannot be good.
88. And from this it is clear that everyone’s natural will is iniquitous and bad.
89. Grace as a mediator is necessary to reconcile the law with the will.
90. The grace of God is given for the purpose of directing the will, lest it err even in loving God. In opposition to Gabriel.
91. It is not given so that good deeds might be induced more frequently and readily, but because without it no act of love is performed. In opposition to Gabriel.
92. It cannot be denied that love is superfluous if man is by nature able to do an act of friendship. In opposition to Gabriel.
93. There is a kind of subtle evil in the argument that an act is at the same time the fruit and the use of the fruit. In opposition to Ockham, the Cardinal, Gabriel.
94. This holds true also of the saying that the love of God may continue alongside an intense love of the creature.
95. To love God is at the same time to hate oneself and to know nothing but God.
96. We must make our will conform in every respect to the will of God (in opposition to the Cardinal);
97. So that we not only will what God wills, but also ought to will whatever God wills.

In these statements we wanted to say and believe we have said nothing that is not in agreement with the Catholic church and the teachers of the church.
1517 ,


God be praised, taken from https://www.theologynetwork.org/unquenchable-flame/luther/the-97-theses.htm these are not the 95 Theses on indulgences but treat more on the topic of leaning too much on worldy scholastic influence. Thanks be to God for Juan Francisco Callejas Aquino who made me aware of these and may God guide us and bless you in Jesus Holy name

Praise Jesus, 12 years of ever increasing Joy

Praise Jesus, 12 years of ever increasing Joy

Hallelujah, here is to 12 years of every day being happier or more Joyful than the last. Since having been baptized in water in 27 Feb 2006, as Ron Sheryl Hoak recommended and then a retreat that dad here Roger L. Cowan recommended in March where i recognized God is fully more in control of my life than i am and i am clay in His hands, and through Jesus Christ we can trust in Him that He will develop us to succeed at doing His will which is good, pleasing and perfect, and He will perfect the good work He started in us. Yes we have to do God’s will, and if we truly believe in Jesus Christ as He is in the Bible ( and we should test ourselves that we do), God will make sure we will do this through His Holy Spirit even though we may be fools as in Isaiah 35:8. In essence God’s will is trusting in Jesus and loving one another in the way that is modeled in Jesus Christ and followed by His apostles (see 1st Corinthians 4:8-16),

8 Already you have all you want! Already you have become rich! Without us you have become kings! And would that you did reign, so that we might share the rule with you! 9 For I think that God has exhibited us apostles as last of all, like men sentenced to death, because we have become a spectacle to the world, to angels, and to men. 10 We are fools for Christ’s sake, but you are wise in Christ. We are weak, but you are strong. You are held in honor, but we in disrepute. 11 To the present hour we hunger and thirst, we are poorly dressed and buffeted and homeless, 12 and we labor, working with our own hands. When reviled, we bless; when persecuted, we endure; 13 when slandered, we entreat. We have become, and are still, like the scum of the world, the refuse of all things.

14 I do not write these things to make you ashamed, but to admonish you as my beloved children. 15 For though you have countless guides in Christ, you do not have many fathers. For I became your father in Christ Jesus through the gospel. 16 I urge you, then, be imitators of me.

1Cor11:1 imitate me then as i imitate Jesus Christ

Still the root of this is that we love one another even as God loved us through Christ, and through faith in Christ we can do this, as He edifies us in God’s Love. In Jesus is where we find fullness of Joy, and we can ask things in His name and He does them, He does more than eye has seen or ear heard or person thought of, far more than we can ask or imagine is what He has in store for those who love Him. And while in Christ there are miracles, Love is the ultimate way is what i see in 1 Corinthias 12:31 & 13. And though we are disciplined (and what Loving Father doesn’t discipline His children) God does it so we can share in His Holiness. God is Love, and He is Holy, Holy, Holy. A holiness which is also rooted in Love as i understand 1Thes3:12,13, that we be blamelessly practicing love.

A Father who doesn’t discipline his children hates them, and instead it is the devil that encourages us into destructive actions, he came to steal kill and destroy, but Jesus that we have life. Though when we are disciplined it is uncomfortable, we will have a crop of peace, and righteousness, far better than the military of the earth would provide is that provided by the army of light. We can even consider our trials the purest of Joys, because they develop patience, which is the first thing mentioned about Love in 1st Corinthians 13, and patience must finish its work so we can be perfect, lacking in nothing. We are really quite happy with Jesus Christ, come in the flesh.

As the scriptures foretold from millennia before, He was born of a blessed and imperfect like us all Virgin, conceived by the perfect Holy Spirit, led a blameless life serving us to the end, and did and still does many miracles to testify to Him and still serves us interceding for us in Heaven. He was crucified, died and tasted death for all who believe, for we will never taste death, and buried. He did so because without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sins, it says in Leviticus 17:11, Hebrews 9:22. The blood of flawed animals would never purchase eternal life for us. He died on a cross taking away our curse and He resurrected on the third day by the power of God, of true Love, and Jesus is seated now as the Lord of Lords and King of Kings, the name above all names.

Jesus preached that we repent and Believe in the good news of God and be baptized for the remission of sins. Forgive others and be forgiven by the power of God, and may we all be turning from darkness to light, forsaking our dead works and may we find rest in Christ. All things in Jesus name for there is no other way to the Father but through Him. We can cast our burdens and cares on Him for He cares for us, and rest and learn from Him at His feet and He will move all things around us until we are ready; for few and indeed only one thing is needed, and He is the treasure in the field worth giving up all for – and we can only receive this treasure if we do so, so may we fear God all day long and be wise and not fear man, may we become like little children, and while caring for orphans and widows in their distress forsake our friendship with the world. Friendship with the world including the lusts of the flesh, the lusts of the eyes, the pride in posessions and the vanities of this life which causes us to harbor enmity to the Holiest of Holies. His enemies shall be cast into a lake of fire that burns forever and ever, and will never be quenched. Through Christ alone can we avoid this, and it is given to us to live once and then face judgement, a judgment which we have all failed when measured against the goodness of God, but by the sacrifice of Christ.

And Now may the God of peace himself sanctify you completely, and may your whole spirit and soul and body be kept blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. He who calls you is faithful; he will surely do it – from 1thes5:23,24, and many other verses too, to God be the glory and all things in Jesus His only begotten Son’s name

President Trump rolls back contraceptive mandate, allows employers to follow consciences

President Trump rolls back contraceptive mandate, allows employers to follow consciences

President Trump rolls back contraceptive mandate, allows employers to follow consciences

On Friday morning, President Donald Trump rolled back the Health & Human Services Contraception mandate, a highly controversial provision of the Affordable Care Act. The mandate required employers to provide all forms of contraception to their employees, including sterilization and potential abortifacients.

Hallelujah, Re: Not giving flowers being based on law and not grace.

Hallelujah, Re: not selling flowers being based on law and not grace.

God be praised, i was made a comment regarding The Washington Supreme Court obligates a Christian Florist to Serve a ‘Gay Wedding’ by my dearly beloved friend Hannah. She had said it was wrong for the lady who had refused decorating flowers for a ‘gay couple’ flowers because it was unkind and it was based on law and not on grace. I do want to mention the florist (Arlene ) had served them 9 years (i would say lovingly if they had been customers for so long) but decided to not do so for their ‘wedding’. I think might be true that it is based on law and not on some forms of grace, but the questions are: is being based on law in this case wrong, as  we are subject to the law of Christ ( 1 Corinthians 9:21 ), and sin is lawlessness (1 John 3:4 , 2 Peter 3:17 ); and would selling them flowers in this case be based on the true grace of God (1 Peter 5:12 ) or on a perversion of that grace ( Jude 1:4 ).

Another question that could arise is regarding that of conscience ( Romans 14: 15,23 ). I would not agree with the Washington Supreme court that: if flowers were provided for a wedding of Atheists is the same as a wedding provided for a homosexual couple, as she would be promoting marriage in the atheist case, and it is a good thing that people marry, to help not fornicate, and her kindness in this case would counter atheism in showing them love. But in the case of a ‘wedding’ between a homosexual couple (which no such thing exists before the Lord, He told me) i see that she would be co-participating with the very act of perversion ( Ephesians 5:11,12, 1 Timothy 5:22 ). She would be doing this with prior foreknowledge in i think a similar way that if someone could eat meat until someone mentions it was sacrificed to idols (1 Corinthians 10:28, 29 ). I do not believe we should ‘witch hunt’ and make sure what we create is not used wrongly. Love always trusts/believes ( 1 Corinthians 13:7 ).

As a difference however, in this case it would also guard the conscience of oneself because though an idol in itself is nothing (1 Corinthians 8:4 ) , ( Though we should stay away from idols anyways 1 John 5:21 ), but un-repented actively homosexual relationships are something grave to the point of inhibiting entrance to Heaven even if belief in Jesus is claimed ( 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 ). This seems to be the point of the movie “Audacity“, that sometimes what seems outwardly like unkindness is what is best and most loving in order to save a person ( Proverbs 28:23 ). Please feel free to read the book and context of 1st Peter. I understand it is directed to Christians who have had their possessions and businesses taken away, like in Hebrews 10:34, due to their acts of conscience and faith. This is quite similar to Arlene’s situation.

Let me know what you think in the comments section please. One could argue for example if a soldier forces you to go one mile and you are against war is it still better to go two, which most theologians i have heard, say is the context of the command? I think a difference is The Bible never tells a soldier/police to stop being one, as in Romans 13, or Matthew 8:5-13. But i think it dissuades against violence in a somehow similar way it dissuades against slavery.  I hope this all makes sense. May God help me be sober, guide us and bless Arlene, readers and all involved in Jesus name.

Planned Parenthood’s Pre-K Gender Guide Will Make Your Head Explode

Planned Parenthood’s Pre-K Gender Guide Will Make Your Head Explode

Planned Parenthood’s Pre-K Gender Guide Will Make Your Head Explode

The nation’s largest abortion provider just released guidelines for parents instructing them how to talk to their preschool-aged children about gender identity. Planned Parenthood’s new guide insists that telling a child that genitals differentiate the sexes is wrong.

El Salvador jails raped teenager for 30 years under murder laws after she said she suffered miscarriage | The Independent

El Salvador jails raped teenager for 30 years under murder laws after she said she suffered miscarriage | The Independent

God who is gracious and kind guide us and bless you, I don’t want to promote abortion i do however want to promote justice and mercy which both seem to be lacking from the incarceration without sufficient proof of 30 years of a woman who suffered a miscarriage of a baby she claims she was unaware of originally conceived after a rape. Lord please help her and the situation in Salvador that this bring justice to light but not be useful for abortion to become a viable alternative for pretty much any case i can think of, in Jesus name

El Salvador jails raped teenager for 30 years under murder laws after ‘she suffered miscarriage’

A teenager has been jailed for 30 years after suffering what her lawyers said was a miscarriage, after she was raped a year ago. A court in El Salvador, a country that has perhaps the world’s most strict laws on reproductive rights, found that Evelyn Beatriz Hernández Cruz, 19, had killed her baby by throwing it into a latrine pit after she gave birth.

Evelyn Beatriz Hernández Cruz